12/9/2009 12:03:39 PM #

Unfortunately the summit will not resolve climate change. The Government were already given the solutions in 2001 and turned them down.

eg

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ecodome/

Parts of the proposal were then disseminated into other areas such as a UN Environment and Development report commissioned by the UN Government from which the agenda of the 2005G8, climate change and Africa, was derived and the climate change/ terrorism risk assessment which Sir David King later gave global publicity too.

NASA scientist James Hansen is correct it is far better the summit is a failure, so proper solutions can be implemented.

Roger Thomas

12/9/2009 12:37:55 PM #

sir this is one the most important summit of the decade where decision is going to take about the destiny of our earth. the proposal that different going to place in this summit is planned from early. but one have to understand taht the global warming is the bye-product of rich industrialized nation from where they got the dividend as a boost to their economy . those country should come out with comprehensive plan to stop global warming and also the other nation too. i think collective decision is very important to save the earth.

kuntal chowdhury

12/9/2009 1:18:26 PM #

kuntal chowdhury

As you say

"where decision is going to take about the destiny of our earth"

Remember no decision is better than a wrong decision.

We need failure here to ensure we get the right path to the future. Not some compromise more skewed towards more economic growth related to carbon trading.

The planet should come first not the commodity market profits.

Roger Thomas

12/9/2009 7:43:00 PM #

There is no tipping point this is all **** . In the 1930s the temperature was higher than today then it cooled in the 60s and warmed a bit to 2000 and has cooled to 2009.
The Little Ice Age was colder that today and we have warmed out of it, before that was the Medieval Warm Period where it was warmer than we have seen this century.
Co2 is not the big Evil on this planet it is the politicians who want more and more. Our Children will not thank us for putting this burden of TAX on them.
Life will be here in 2000 years time if we don’t go into another ICE AGE.
Nemo

Jon Nemo

12/15/2009 7:11:10 AM #

I agree with Jon Nemo. The official position of the World Natural Health Organization in regards to global warming is that there is no global warming. Global warming is nothing more than just another hoax, just like Y2K and the global freezing claims in the 1960's and 70's were.

Global warming is being used to generate fear and panic. Those behind this movement are using it to control people's lives and for financial gain.

A recent petition has been signed by over 31,000 scientists, as follows:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

Tim Pearson